Creativity vs. Stock
Are micro-payment stock sites killing the professional industry?

Stock photography prices have come down with the availability of the internet... but is this a good thing?
Being a designer of a “certain age” I remember when stock photography was an expensive necessity, and hiring an illustrator was the norm. Pouring over glossy catalogs where these professionals showed their work and picking just the right technique for what you wanted to portray, was always a treat. Being able, as a designer, to hire these individuals was a thrill. Art directing a complete photo shoot including models, wardrobe, location, etc. was a necessary part of our industry. Stock photography was available, but sometimes, the cost was just as steep as taking the photo. Then the digital age came, and in my opinion, disrupted a whole generation of amazing professionals.
These days with the help of the Internet, stock photography sites have taken off. The cost of hiring professionals was at an all time high when I started in this industry, and just having the customer allow for such external costs was a godsend. Now it seems like all has changed for the cheap thrill of pre-canned photos and stock art.
Today, every designer faces the cost vs. uniqueness conundrum. Not every customer sees the value of a custom photo or illustration when they can easily look for one online. They give up on individuality (and not to mention creativity gets the ax), but in turn, they get a more or less decent looking model that looks “professional” for their brochure, and that is all they seem to care about.
The only time where a stock photo will certainly not work is when the customer has an actual product that needs to be sold. For that, they will need a professional to take a picture of that item. And even that will probably be silhouetted and placed into a stock background of some sort.
You could say that the days of custom illustration and high-end photography have been reserved for the true quality and art connoisseur customer who sees the value of standing out for their individuality, or the well-to-do ones that can pay for the right to be unique… Well, I disagree.
I do have nostalgia for the old ways, but to be able to roll with the changes has proven to be a big part of my survival in this industry. As a designer, it is my job to be able to take the available budget and still create individual and unique ways of portraying a customer’s product or service. They may not have the budget of Apple, but most small to medium companies don’t, and these companies are the bread and butter of our industry.
So, yes, we have lost some individuality, but we have gained the ability to look good, even if it is at discount prices. All it takes is the ability to take all these lemons and make lemonade… for that, hire a professional!
By: Michelle Martorell
Creative Director, Archer Communications, Inc.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Bravo…I agree 100%. In fact, the invention of the computer really impacted the industry as a whole as well as a a number of very talented graphic designers I worked with. That’s right, left brains and right brains were asked to come together and learn how to play nice. Unfortunately, I saw some VERY talented people give up their craft rather than succumb to technology. On the other hand, I was some very well meaning administrator assistants trying to do a designer’s job on PC’s. It was enough to change the industry forever. All of a sudden, I’m feeling very old!
Don’t you think that It can be problematic when companies are trying to be sincere and resort to using stock photographs?
Though stock works in many cases, some may perceive its use as offensive in a few different scenarios. For instance, if a home for disabled living used stock photos, it might look offensive to some.
Here is an article I found containing poor use use of stock photos which cause the otherwise positive movement to look insincere – http://thinkprogress.org/2010/03/10/api-stock-photos/
I agree 100%! The company in that article is being criticized for is for using stock photo people as real people talking about a touchy issue. That is totally tacky and wrong.
There are a few instances where I would advice a customer NOT to use stock at any cost. One would be political issues (like the one you wrote about) that is just insulting. The other would be when they are talking about a specific place, item or product where the subject of the picture is unique. Keep in mind there is only so much magic a designer can do when it comes to product images. The best course of action there is hire a good photographer and get good pictures.
Now, if the subject is general like for example “business” then a stock photo would be perfect. You just have to be conscious what the subject is and what it is intended for.
Use stock photos with caution or it could have dire consequences!
I must say, I enjoy your site. Could tell me how I can subscribing with it? I feel I should let you know I discovered this website through Lycos.
What you do is great – but more frequent updates, please?
Hi there, I found your blog by means of Google at the same time as searching for a related topic, your website came up, it seems good. I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.